Currently we draw and send the screens for a graphical LCD all at once.
We draw in two or four parts but draw them directly behind each other.
For the tested status screen this takes 59-62ms in a single block.
During this time nothing else (except the interrupts) can be done.
When printing a sequence of very short moves the buffer drains - sometimes until it's empty.
This PR splits the screen update into parts.
Currently we have 10 time slots. During the first one the complete screen is drawn. (60,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)
Here i introduce pauses for doing other things. (30,30,0,0,0,0,0,0) or (15,15,15,15,0,0,0,0,0,0)
Drawing in consecutive time slots prevents from lagging too much. Even with a 4 stripe display all the drawing is done after 400ms.
Previous experiments with a even better distribution of the time slots like
(30,0,0,0,0,30,0,0,0,0) and (15,0,15,0,15,0,15,0,0,0) did not feel good when using the menu, because of too much lag.
Because of the previous PRs to speed up the display updates and especially reducing the difference between drawing 2 or 4 stripes,
it now makes sense for the REPRAP_DISCOUNT_FULL_GRAPHIC_SMART_CONTROLLER to go from 2 to 4 stripes. This costs about 1-2ms per complete
screen update, but is payed back by having partial updates lasting only the half time and two additional brakes. Also ~256 byte of
framebuffer are saved in RAM.
13:45:59.213 : echo: #:17 >:13 s:30; #:16 >:13 s:29; S#:33 S>:26 S:59
13:46:00.213 : echo: #:16 >:14 s:30; #:17 >:13 s:30; S#:33 S>:27 S:60
13:46:01.215 : echo: #:17 >:13 s:30; #:16 >:13 s:29; S#:33 S>:26 S:59
13:46:02.215 : echo: #:16 >:13 s:29; #:16 >:14 s:30; S#:32 S>:27 S:59
13:46:03.214 : echo: #:17 >:13 s:30; #:17 >:13 s:30; S#:34 S>:26 S:60
13:46:04.214 : echo: #:16 >:13 s:29; #:16 >:14 s:30; S#:32 S>:27 S:59
13:46:05.212 : echo: #:16 >:14 s:30; #:17 >:13 s:30; S#:33 S>:27 S:60
13:46:06.212 : echo: #:17 >:13 s:30; #:16 >:13 s:29; S#:33 S>:26 S:59
03:30:36.779 : echo: #:8 >:7 s:15; #:10 >:7 s:17; #:8 >:6 s:14; #:8 >:7 s:15; S#:34 S>:27 S:61
03:30:37.778 : echo: #:8 >:6 s:14; #:10 >:7 s:17; #:9 >:7 s:16; #:8 >:6 s:14; S#:35 S>:26 S:61
03:30:38.778 : echo: #:8 >:6 s:14; #:11 >:7 s:18; #:8 >:6 s:14; #:8 >:7 s:15; S#:35 S>:26 S:61
03:30:39.777 : echo: #:8 >:6 s:14; #:10 >:7 s:17; #:8 >:8 s:16; #:8 >:6 s:14; S#:34 S>:27 S:61
03:30:40.780 : echo: #:8 >:6 s:14; #:11 >:7 s:18; #:8 >:6 s:14; #:8 >:6 s:14; S#:35 S>:25 S:60
03:30:41.780 : echo: #:9 >:6 s:15; #:10 >:7 s:17; #:8 >:6 s:14; #:9 >:6 s:15; S#:36 S>:25 S:61
03:30:42.779 : echo: #:8 >:6 s:14; #:10 >:8 s:18; #:8 >:6 s:14; #:8 >:6 s:14; S#:34 S>:26 S:60
03:30:43.778 : echo: #:9 >:6 s:15; #:10 >:7 s:17; #:8 >:7 s:15; #:9 >:6 s:15; S#:36 S>:26 S:62
#: draw a stripe
>: transfer a stripe
s: sum of of draw and transfer for one stripe
S#: sum of draws for a complete screen
S>: sum of transfers for a complete screen
S: time to draw and transfer a complete screen
Supports both dual and single head printers (with the correct config).
Includes community sourced feed rate fix.
Rename / move files.
Remove redundant definitions.
and saving ~1k memory
by limiting the `#pragma GCC optimize (3)` optimisation to `ultralcd_st7920_u8glib_rrd.h`. These optimisation was and is not done for all the other displays, is the reason for the big additionally use of memory, because the complete 'ultralcd.cpp' and 'dogm_lcd_implementation.h' was optimised (sadly i did not observe a change in speed).
Unrolling the loop in `ST7920_SWSPI_SND_8BIT()`, what i expected the optimiser to do, by hand, saved some speed by eliminating the loop variable (i) compares and increases. Every CPU cycle in this loop costs at least 0.5ms per display update because it's executed more than 1k times/s.
The delays are now pre-filled with the calculated values for 4.5V driven ST7920.
A way to simply add __your__ timing into the configuration was made.
At 4.5V
1.) The CLK signal needs to be at least 200ns high and 200ns low.
2.) The DAT pin needs to be set at least 40ns before CLK goes high and must stay at this value until 40ns after CLK went high.
A nop takes one processor cycle.
For 16MHz one nop lasts 62.5ns.
For 20MHz one not lasts 50ns.
To fulfill condition 1.) we need 200/62.5 = 3.2 => 4 cycles (200/50 = 4 => 4). For the low phase, setting the pin takes much longer. For the high phase we (theoretically) have to throw in 2 nops, because changing the CLK takes only 2 cycles.
Condition 2.) is always fulfilled because the processor needs two cycles (100 - 125ns) for switching the CLK pin.
Needs tests and feedback.
Especially i cant test 20MHz, 3DRAG and displays supplied wit less than 5V.
Are the delays right? Please experiment with longer or shorter delays. And give feedback.
Already tested are 5 displays with 4.9V - 5.1V at 16MHz where no delays are needed.
Edited the European part of 'ISO10646_CN.fon' to match the existing fonts.
Added Chinese font to make_fonts.bat
Created 'dogm_font_data_ISO10646_CN.h'
Added Chinese to 'language.h'
Added 'language_cn.h' with some minor edits.
Added Chinese font in 'language_en.h' to not fall back to European font.
Added cn to 'Configuration.h'
Changed WIDTH to LCD_PIXEL_WIDTH and HEIGHT to LCD_PIXEL_HEIGHT to have more descriptive names.
In 'dogm_lcd_implementation.h'
Added Chinese Font
Made 1 pixel more room for the larger Chinese font on the status line.
Changed geometry of the 'select bar' by one pixel.
Changed the way the position for values and postcars are set.
AnHardt